I work with founders, CTOs, and engineering teams when technical decisions actually matter.
This is usually the case when systems are complex, risky to change, or already under pressure — hitting scaling limits, accumulating architectural debt, and driving up costs.
You might recognize these symptoms:
— It’s getting harder to ship: the system is stable, but dangerously rigid.
— You’re having the same architectural debates for the third month in a row.
— Shared ownership has turned into no ownership at all.
— Teams prioritize local patches because structural changes feel too risky.
— Maintenance consumes the budget that was meant for growth.
My role is to provide structure, clarity and high-leverage technical oversight: isolate real risks, explain trade-offs, and help teams choose directions they can live with long-term.
• • •
That may mean reviewing an existing architecture, designing a new one, outlining a clear technical direction, or acting as an independent advisor — without vendor bias.
This is not for teams looking for someone to “just fix” or for situations where the main goal is the lowest possible cost.
How it works: We start with a short conversation to establish fit and context. After that, I follow up with a proposal for the next steps.
You can contact me by email with a brief note about your situation.
█